evoyo.la
Services
Code & Architecture Audit
An honest assessment of your existing codebase: what holds up, what doesn’t, where the real risks are — not just a linter report.
Currently taking on new projects
The starting point
Grown codebases rarely show the real risks at first glance — a linter flags style issues, not the database query missing a tenant filter or the payment webhook without signature verification. Anyone facing a takeover, an investment decision, or simply wanting clarity on a project’s state wants an honest, prioritized assessment, not tool output.
How I approach it
-
Architecture and security review along the actual risk surfaces: auth, payment/webhook processing, data isolation, database schema.
-
Findings prioritized by real risk and effort, not by the number of linter warnings.
-
Concrete, actionable recommendations instead of a plain problem list — implementation of the critical points on request.
What you get
- A written, prioritized list of the actual risks — understandable even for non-developers on the team.
- Clarity on what you’re taking on with a takeover or further development, before time and money are committed.
- On request: the critical points fixed directly instead of only documented.
Matching case studies
Gutz Admin
Central Filament 5 admin that unifies the admin surfaces of Gutz Intern and the club website via a multi-database architecture.
View case study "Gutz Admin" →Kreacorp
Browser-based sci-fi economic strategy game with trading, research, sabotage, and clans, installable as a cross-platform app.
View case study "Kreacorp" →Frequently asked questions